the plans below show a public when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
The depicted pictures illustrate the comparison of the Granage Park between the established year in 1920 and at present.
Generally, it is apparently observed from the images that the current layout of the park stays remained as the first day. In addition to that, another entrance for the car park has been erected underground on the bottom right corner. There are a lot of adjustments as well as new functions which have been added to the park.
As was the case in 1920, there are still two main entries in the center of the northern and southern borders of the park. At the heart, the former fountain was completely dismantled. Instead, a new square garden of roses is constructed, which is surrounded by four seats benches on all four sides. There was another rose garden on the top left of the park which has been still intact since the first day.
Currently, the old musical stage on the day is improved dramatically and refurbished to the amphitheater for concerts, that stands on the left of the central rose garden. Beside that, some constructors have been destructed such as two other gardens, glasshouses and ponds. As a substitute, new children playground, water feature and cafe have been constructed at different parts of the Grange.
- Some people think job satisfaction is more important than job security while others believe that having a permanent job is better than enjoying the job Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- the plans below show a public when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 78
- The government should control the amount of violence in films and on television in order to decrease the level of violent crime in society Do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, if, so, still, well, in addition, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89201877934 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71484125194 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577464788732 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.2328003772 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.7272727273 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107896217498 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429808725234 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425926465124 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708703622519 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415645331579 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.