Some people think that technology is now an invaluable study tool for young people. Others, however, believe that it is harmful for the studying process. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Many a person hold the opinion that technology exerts negative effects on youngsters’ studying process now. Nonetheless, this is contradicted by other people, myself included, who espouse the notion that technology has been positively impacting on their learning. These two opposing perspectives will be clarified below.
On the one hand, there are a number of different explanations to be taken into account as to why it is detrimental to students to depend on technology to support their study now. For one thing, this might result in learners becoming more and more passive in their learning. By and large, students are not encouraged to memorize and apply what they have been taught at school on the grounds that they are totally able to search everything to do their assignments on the Internet within a few minutes. For another, the fact that there are a large number of harmful information sources on the Internet relating to sex, racial discrimination, fake news and violence deserves consideration. A lot of youngsters easily access them to indulge their curiosity without an effective method of protection from adults, with the result that they usually tend to have acts of violence and misbehaviours nowadays.
On the other hand, it is my contention that technology is a supportive tool for teenagers for several reasons. To begin with, granted that thanks to technology, all human knowledge is collected and published in public for education and scientific research of the community, students can search a great deal of valuable knowledge to serve their learning. Another important factor for this is students can take full advantage of technology to get online learning instead of offline one in cases of pandemics, natural disasters. Given the fact that there are more opportunities for students to keep learning without being limited by any obstacles like weather and distance, general and higher education is more likely to be delivered to students in remote areas.
In conclusion, I take the position that while to some extent technology has its shortcomings, it is also an indispensable tool to support students’ learning for the reasons mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-04 | _harley_ | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-14 | _harley_ | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-04 | _harley_ | 92 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | Nguyễn Tuấn Kiệt | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-11 | Nguyễn Tuấn Kiệt | 84 | view |
- Some people think that technology is now an invaluable study tool for young people Others however believe that it is harmful for the studying process Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Children benefit more from playing outdoors with other children than from playing computer games indoors on their own To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- People should follow native customs and traditions when starting to live in a new country To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- People are becoming too dependent on the Internet and phones Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 537, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s. For another, the fact that there are a large number of harmful information sources on the Inte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, nonetheless, so, while, as to, in conclusion, by and large, for one thing, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25214899713 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96283661955 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575931232092 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.0263040505 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8461538462 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187741845506 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715779435037 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635999215005 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119801269471 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198210667201 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.