Claim: An piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Everyday, especially in the present times, we are bombarded with myriad amout of information. It would be a humungous task for one to validate the accuracy of the information without anyone's help. The claim in the prompt suggests that any piece of information referred to as fact should be viewed with skipticism because much of the information assumed factual turns out to be inaccurate. However, I disagree with the reason provided in the prompt and feel that it is not the case in the present times.
Firstly, I would like to expound upon the cases in which the reason given in the prompt is applicable. In the ancient times, people thought the earth was flat. Given the knowledge and the capabilities of the humans during those times, it was obvious for everyone to assume the earth was flat as they could not mistrust their eyes. In similar fashion, people aslo thought the sun revolves around the earth and earth was the center of the solar system. The pieces of information were considered as facts and anyone who promulgated otherwise were immediatly banish from the society. However, eventually these facts were proved to be wrong and people amended their views once they understood the ratiocination in arriving at the truth. These a few examples among many such similar accounts. Given such experiences in the past, one would be tempted to conclude that every fact should be treated with cynicism. However, is the reason given in the prompt applicable in the present times too? The answer is no.
We have come a long way both interms of our intellectual capabilities as well as technological advancements since we started inhabitating this planet. Any piece of information that we discover or come across is first conscientiously scrutinized with help of methodologies that are immune to errors by a group of qualified poeple and only then the information is presented as a fact to the common people. Given the level of validation that any information goes through the present times, it would be fatuous of one to look at every piece of information with doubt. The instances were a certain fact is redressed in the wake of new evidence or realization of an error in the methodologies do occur sometimes but it is more rare than often. Therefore, in the present timees, where any information is first ratified by sound methodologies and astute personnel, it seems gratuitous to conclude that every fact should be viewed with doubt
To recapitulate, the reason mentioned in the prompt does not hold true in the present times as every piece of information is throughty scrutinized and only then is dissemilated among the population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-12 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Kamnele | 33 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | IshaanN | 50 | view |
- Professors are normally found in university classrooms of ces and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students More and more however they also appear as guests on television news programs giving expert commentary on the latest events in the wo 73
- In an attempt to improve highway safety Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways But this effort has failed the number of accidents has not decreased and based on reports by the highway patrol man 68
- Chevalier memoir 70
- The following recommendation appeared in a memo from the mayor of the town of Hopewell Two years ago the nearby town of Ocean View built a new municipal golf course and resort hotel During the past two years tourism in Ocean View has increased new busines 58
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: Every day
Everyday, especially in the present times, we ar...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: OBVIOUS_FOR[1]
Message: The adjective obvious is normally used with 'to': 'obvious to everyone'.
Suggestion: obvious to everyone
...f the humans during those times, it was obvious for everyone to assume the earth was flat as they co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...nterms of our intellectual capabilities as well as technological advancements since we sta...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 691, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'occur'.
Suggestion: sometimes occur
...ion of an error in the methodologies do occur sometimes but it is more rare than often. Therefo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 933, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t every fact should be viewed with doubt To recapitulate, the reason mentioned in...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, then, therefore, well, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96846846847 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86579606941 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484234234234 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.1024453898 60.3974514979 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.105263158 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3684210526 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52631578947 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303524922781 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863336380958 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10353633326 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184984359091 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827770522834 0.0667264976115 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.