The graph below shows unusual water usage (in millions of cable meters) by industries in some countries.
The bar chart elucidates untypical water utilization by numerous industries in some regions in the measurement of millions of cable meters.
Overall, the most excessive quantity of groundwater uses for chemicals, whilst the least amount of public supply will be the necessary source for fuel and textile companies.
To begin with, these two categories of water, which are ground and public supply will be the fundamental resource in seven various industries. Especially, chemical products require the biggest amount of groundwater, presumably 430 million cable meters, and the metal items are the second prominent users by utilizing 240 million. Subsequently, machinery regions consume only 10 million cable meter water, which is the least quantity compared to the other companies.
Moreover, public supply is relatively fewer rather than the groundwater in chemicals by 240 million cable meters. Then, employees use 190 million meters of water in order to prepare food and drinks. However, textiles and fuel-producing factories consume only 10 million, which is the lowest amount rather than others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-28 | nigora@ | 78 | view |
| 2020-02-25 | pavel | 10 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | Mayupatel | 67 | view |
| 2018-12-17 | Muskan.seth | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | Zakaryazada | 61 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of households with cars in a European country between 1971 and 2001 73
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen Is it a positive or negative development 73
- Some people say it is more important to plant trees in the open spaces in towns and cities than to build more housing To what extant do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region 73
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, second, so, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63473053892 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80164020742 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616766467066 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5603910315 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.625 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215693062764 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103937956842 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753573693157 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139592906013 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878556552786 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, second, so, then, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63473053892 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80164020742 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616766467066 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5603910315 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.625 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215693062764 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103937956842 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753573693157 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139592906013 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878556552786 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.