A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.
Nowadays, the value of money is doubled, thus people think that money is important for social status and material possessions. A person’s worth is measured by luxurious life, high profile work, person’s look etc. As a result, our honor, kindness and trust are going to be old fashioned and importance will be decreased. I partially disagree with this statement.
On one hand, with the fast pace of life, people are getting more involved in word because time is money, due to this, people are judges by their work, income whether he or she is kind or not. Such as the value if CEO is more compared to manager in organization though, the behavior of CEO is crucial. The reason behind it the position, power, professional outfit thus, all employee give respect to CEO apart from manager while, manager has more responsibility, he or she has to work more etc. but no one give respect to manager. By this way, everyone wants to be rich to live luxurious life because it gives them high status in society.
On the other hand, all people do not follow this path, some people still believe that kindness, trust, honor, respect all are important to live satisfactory life. The reason behind is money does not buy everything, no one can buy happiness, trust from money. One such example it Nita Ambani, she is working with reliance which is multinational company also she is the owner of one Indian Premier League cricket team. Her status is high not only because of money but also she is running one foundation for child education, to help physically disable children etc. thus, this is the reason why she is very respectable person for society.
To conclude that, all people are not same, some people think for society, for nation, for world. We cannot blame to all rich person because of one person. So I partially disagree with this statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-04 | tsln7607 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-15 | Nowshin Tabassum | 61 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | tuyetsa2004@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-14 | ThanhNT | 89 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, still, thus, while, apart from, as to, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.765625 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51898843474 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5375 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0602994949 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7058823529 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15434767264 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549244172933 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590192987874 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112889878276 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0976869246747 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.