The table below give information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000
The table reveals the average distance measured in miles which each person traveled in England by various transport means during a 16-year period from 1985 to 2000. Overall, car was by far the most used vehicle and the number of miles travelled by all modes witnessed a remarkable increase during the time surveyed.
Regarding the figure for all modes, the average miles rose significantly by over 1,700 miles, from 4,740 miles in 1985 to 6,475 miles in 2000. The figure for car stayed well beyond the others, at 3,199 miles in 1985 then increasing by over 1,000 from 3,199 miles to 4,806 miles. This was followed by that for long-distance bus, train and other, experiencing an unremarkable rise over the period. The distance traveled by taxi was significantly threefold its initial value, 42 miles in the last year compared with 13 miles in the first year.
There was a downward trend in terms of the remaining vehicles. It can be seen that bicycles were the least used modes of travel after 15 years. The average miles people walking slightly decrease, 255 miles in 1985 as opposed 247 miles in 2000 respectively. Meanwhile, that of local bus dropped roughly twofold from 429 miles in the first year to 274 in the last year.
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 87
- The chart shows the main methods of transportation for people traveling to a university for work or study in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82547169811 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48066122945 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589622641509 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4014802271 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.3 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123727826896 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550847621495 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552868916641 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107149360796 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056606180901 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.