The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The line graph compares the number of inquiries that one particular Tourist Information Office was asked by three different means over a course of six months, starting from January 2011.
Overall, it is evident that the quantities of questions received through either direct communication or telephone increased significantly throughout the reviewed period, whereas the opposite was true for mailing platforms. Moreover, it is clear that tourists preferred to ask questions in person most in the end, despite this was the least chosen method in January.
In January, around 900 inquiries came up in telephone conversation, relatively higher than the two other channels. This figure almost quadrupled in June, reaching a high of 1600 questions, despite a slight decrease in February. The number of questions received face-to-face was the lowest in January, with roughly 400 questions asked. However, in the next six months, it experienced a tremendous growth of nearly 5 times up until June, surpassing telephone figures in the middle of the year, and ending the period at 1900 questions, making direct communication the most common ways to ask questions.
Conversely, the preference for letter/ mail platforms weakened over the timeframe, as numbers dropping steadily from 800 to only 400 questions in June, a drop by half of its starting figure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-04 | brew | 65 | view |
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | euphorianmt | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-03 | leuleu28 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 84
- The graph below shows relative price changes for fresh fruits and vegetables sugars and sweets and carbonated drinks between 1978 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at 92
- proportion of population aged 65 and over in Japan Sweden and USA
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 73
- The graph shows the percentage of female members of Parliament in European countries between 2000 and 2012 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, moreover, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41706161137 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92007748126 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644549763033 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2033209315 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.875 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202051648257 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810405375812 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106400911399 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136906825293 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127926276825 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.4140731707 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.