It is more important for the government to spend public funds on promoting a healthy lifestyle than treatment.
In recent decades, the world health care system has been facing consecutive outbreaks of diseases. With the thought that an ounce of prevent is worth a pound of cure, some people believe that governments should spend more money improving citizens’ awareness about healthy lifestyle rather than treatment. In my viewpoint, I strongly agree with this statement.
First of all, Concentrating budgets on the prevention of diseases will bring more economic benefits than researching a cure when an epidemic has broken out. When there is an epidemic outbreak, the government will face budgetary pressure for health services such as medical examination and treatment, testing, and quarantine. In addition, leaders must also deal with the overload of infected patients and the shortage of vaccines. For instance, the Ebola pandemic created a terrible health crisis in West African countries, resulting in thousands of deaths.
Moreover, the outbreaks of dangerous pandemics not only cost healthcare services but also severely affect the economy and slow down or even reduce economic growth. By way of illustration, the COVID-19 pandemic caused millions of people to lose jobs in the USA, many businesses have come to a standstill due to social distancing, and the economy will shrink by about 37% in 2020. Therefore, the precaution of infectious diseases could reduce their spread in the community, thereby avoiding their negative effects on the economy.
In conclusion, the outbreak of any disease is unpredictable and able to lead to many difficult-to-solve issues. For this reason, governments should pay more attention to making a healthy lifestyle for citizens to avoid the severe effects of a disease rather than researching the cure.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-07-04 | Minh Quang | 78 | view |
2021-05-15 | chinh11111 | 78 | view |
2021-05-15 | chinh11111 | 78 | view |
2019-11-04 | junjunh | 84 | view |
2019-11-04 | junjunh | 67 | view |
- It is more important for the government to spend public funds on promoting a healthy lifestyle than treatment 78
- In the past most people used to travel to their place of work With increased use of computers the internet and smartphones more and more people are starting to work from home What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development 56
- Global warming is one of the biggest threats to our environment What causes global warming What solutions are there for this problem 56
- Most people do not care enough about environmental issues To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44074074074 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95869136534 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637037037037 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6529829786 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.416666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204218225424 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635467464362 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977845389139 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128872956747 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818533138456 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44074074074 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95869136534 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637037037037 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6529829786 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.416666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.75 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204218225424 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635467464362 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0977845389139 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128872956747 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818533138456 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.