Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, the inexorable innovations in the fields of science and technology have tremendously influenced the way lectures are delivered. It is now widely asserted that e-learning will eventually make traditional classroom become redundant. While there are some rationales behind this view, I strongly advocate that the traditional way of teaching will not be replaced by online classes in the foreseeable future.
First and foremost, it is understandable why this notion receives a significant amount of support from the bulk of the public. One of the superior features of virtual learning is its convenience as well as time and cost efficiency. This can be attributed to the fact that students can attend classes wherever they are, there would not be a need to get lectures directly in classroom. As a case in point, this trend will afford learners a cutback in petrol prices that have gone through the roof for the past few years. Additionally, web-base classes cater for a wider range of learners, from pupils pursuing formal education at school to working people seeking to cultivate certain skills for their professions. For the aforementioned reasons, online courses are gaining traction in a host of places worldwide.
Nevertheless, there are compelling reasons that make physical classroom irreplaceable . Some subjects require elaborate lab set-up and equipment to be understood further. This situation manifests itself starkly in the fact that there is a significant demand for experiments to be carried out in natural science subjects such as chemistry and physics. Another advantage of studying directly is more two-way interaction with teachers. Traditional classroom model allows students to ask questions more freely compared to e-learning. Moreover, lecturers can often have more control over students and are able to supervise their studies more closely. As a result, online education could not replace the traditional methods of learning.
In conclusion, notwithstanding the justifications behind the belief that e-learning will one day make physical classrooms unnecessary, I assume that there will be no way this form of learning can take the place of brick-and-motar schools.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Huyenlbg87 | 11 | view |
| 2024-11-25 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is this a positive or a negative development 84
- Some people think that movies should only be for entertainment Others think that they should also have educational values Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Please comment my essay Thank you Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individual and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Please help me assess this essay Thank you Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money can be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree or disagree with this idea 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...at make physical classroom irreplaceable . Some subjects require elaborate lab set...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48830409357 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09148173296 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587719298246 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0448026069 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.411764706 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11764705882 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101818511063 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.03490903637 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0384521923638 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0663683859991 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145585151801 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.