Some people think that is is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe it is better for them to study alone.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Working in groups and individually have been two of the most common methods of learning in a host of schools. While it is believed that teamworking is a productive one, opponents of this argue that individual studying can be much more efficient. Despite some rationales behind both views, I strongly advocate that a combination of the 2 ways of learning is crucial for a student’s academic success.
On the one hand, it is hard to overstate the significance of collaboration in an academic environment. People have various views and knowledge about a particular subject, which is the reason why each of them can contribute to the project and make it more perfect. Additionally, with the cooperation of a myriad of people, a huge project can be finished ahead of the deadline. This can be attributed to the fact that each one will just have to do a part of the project that they are assigned. As a result, they have more time to do research on it without worrying about other parts. Therefore, it is asserted that teamworking is substantive for a student’s development because of its effectiveness.
On the other hand, there are compelling arguments behind the efficiency of studying alone. First and foremost, individuals may have complete control over the whole project, organizing the content according to their interests. Another major positive of this method is that learners are given more room to show off their talent and knowledge over a specific subject, which enables the process of grading much easier and fairer. As a case in point, academic competitions are mostly for individuals rather than groups, which empower the organizers to single out the most talented among a large number of students. For the aforementioned reasons, studying individually is considered to be much more fruitful than group work.
In conclusion, notwithstanding the justifications behind both statements, I believe that both methods of learning are equally essential for students’ academic achievements.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-09 | yenle | 56 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | kimtaeyeons | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-08 | Cynthia Nguyen | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-07 | phamhuyne | 67 | view |
| 2020-10-07 | phamhuyne | 80 | view |
- Please help me assess this essay Thank you Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money can be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree or disagree with this idea 84
- Some people believe that for school children their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than parents Others argue that parents are not less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Online classes make conventional classrooms unnecessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think that school time should be used in learning important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged Is this a positive or a negative development 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 583, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s to single out the most talented among a large number of students. For the aforementioned reason...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22910216718 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13256397982 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547987616099 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3275995068 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.6 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229559778365 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740360948474 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648423762056 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145386575877 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367014221219 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.