Technology has made it easier for people to communicate with each other. Some people prefer to talk over the phone. While others prefer to text messages. Which type of communication do you prefer and why?
Along with the advance in technology, human communication becomes handy than ever due to unexpected functions applied on each compact smartphone or computer. Some multi-taskers favor texting their friends or relatives messages rather than talk on the phone, I, as a far-left supporter, subscribe to the latter method of communicating more due to several benefits brought back.
Firstly, clear messages are likely to be transmitted to listeners by talking over the phone. There are several hilarious situations eventuating in view of the miscommunication between the text-person and the receiver. It is irrefutable that different person has their distinct ways in writing down a message; therefore, information can be distorted without deliberating purpose. The reader is able to understand wrongly what is conveyed through a texting message from the tones of the writer to the content in which unnecessary results woefully appear. However, it will be controlled by calling directly to deliver successfully a story.
Another advantage that should be taken into consideration is time reduction. Most people waste their valuable time just thinking of what to say or how to write; however, the story seems to be straightforward if they pick their phone and make a call. Technically, the longest conversation may last for some minutes so that the main points could be reached by the listener. Meanwhile, it could take text-writers several hours to clear what they intend to put down on their message. In the past few years, I wished to quit my job inasmuch as I was no longer in that job. It took me several hours, even a day to write an email sent to my manager; however, it did not work properly since I was stuck in using appropriate language. My co-worker advised me to give a direct call to my senior manager to share and it turned out effective.
In conclusion, not texting, making a phone call can save not only time but also create effectiveness in communication.
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world Some people think that this cannot be changed while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change What is your opinion 81
- Some people say that physical exercise should be a required part of every school day Other people believe that students should spend the whole school day on academic studies Which opinion do you agree with Use specific reasons and details to support your 78
- The map below shows the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 76
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctly to deliver successfully a story. Another advantage that should be taken i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 324.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08024691358 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04531892961 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657407407407 0.524837075471 125% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6643696814 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.733333333 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123229985914 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0368780592011 0.076458572812 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416576324272 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722257171932 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046345564959 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.