In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in?
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this?
It is evident that many households or landowners nowadays are curious more about the foundation time and the source of their houses or flats. There are some main reasons why this becomes a trend, and this essay also points out some noticeable ways which people could apply to research.
To begin with, according to the Asian culture, individuals believe that their accommodation would affect the success and prosperity of their families. Therefore, when Vietnamese people, for example, intend to purchase a new house, knowing more about the source of a house makes them feel safe. Secondly, many strange accidents have been occurring in other people’s houses, which also contributes to the importance of researching the history of a place. For example, a friend of mine, her niece fell down and died in her house, and surrounding neighbors believe that the previous dead landowners still stayed in there and hurt her niece.
Additionally, there are some main methods that families often use to explore the root of a house or a flat. The first way is that households could interview and ask their forefathers or surrounding neighbors who have resided there for a long time. Therefore, landowners could know whether their houses have any spooky anecdotes which might be witnessed by these people. Furthermore, meeting a fortune teller also considers a great way to research the root of a house if those people believe in spiritual aspects. Take an example for my mother, every single year she often goes to meet a fortune teller to foresee any unwanted things which could happen in my family.
In conclusion, it is understandable when people would like to know more about the history of their own private places, therefore, asking their forefathers or a fortune-teller are two principal methods to research.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | tronghuy230903 | 56 | view |
| 2024-05-27 | AnnaAlysia | 84 | view |
| 2024-05-22 | AnnaAlysia | 73 | view |
- Some people think that children should aim to their best at what they doing Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes when set free What are the reasons What can be done to solve the problem 84
- Watching a live performance such as a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some cities create housing areas by providing taller buildings Others create housing by building houses on a wider area of land Which solution is better 78
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas while others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own styles Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...e some main methods that families often use to explore the root of a house or a fla...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13804713805 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75193158684 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56228956229 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1835136849 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 127.166666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238694350567 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848478104991 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796506919714 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167634314196 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0936326882642 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...e some main methods that families often use to explore the root of a house or a fla...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13804713805 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75193158684 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56228956229 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1835136849 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 127.166666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238694350567 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848478104991 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796506919714 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167634314196 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0936326882642 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.