Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets, and there is no need to go to the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema.
It is a heating discussion about which places are the most suitable to enjoy movies as with modern devices like phones or tablets, we can easily gain access to thousands of films without going to the cinema. On the opposite side, it is proposed that films will be more enjoyable in front of an enormous screen. In my viewpoint, I support the latter since the cinema can give people better experience through the showtime.
Less expenditure on tickets is the reason why many people now choose to watch on their own device instead. Before getting to enjoy the film show, people have to pay a considerable amount of money to tickets as well as the food accompanied such as popcorn or soft drink since nobody can resist the tempting smell of it despite its unreasonable price. Besides, such platforms like Netflix is currently the best app for watching movie that provides a wide range of films for people to choose from single movies to documentary movies, especially the TV series. Due to this kind of films, people have developed the habit of binge-watching that applies only to personal device which allows them to lay on the bed or sit wherever they want to watch it.
Despite expensive entry required, cinema offers cinephiles the best experience ever. With a certain sum paid, people can watch the movie on the bigger screen with the highest quality of images that they can even notice the acnes on the actor’s face. In addition, today’s cinema has various kinds of screen from 3D ,4D to screen X. In the case of 4d cinema, people will feel like they are in the same adventure of the character that gives them the spine-chilling but unforgettable experience. Moreover, there are even rooms with luxury beds or cozy sofa that are served some soft drinks to the moviegoers. There was one time in the past when I had an opportunity to enjoy the Imax cinema in the city centre and I would say that it was totally worth it with the room being as big as the stadium and the most realistic experience I have had wearing its separate glasses. The afterglow of it has lasted until now and thanks to the modern showing technique, my favorite movie becomes more touching and effusive than all the previous movies I have watched before.
In conclusion, our phones or tablets are better to be used for watching small tv shows or tv series than the blockbusters which are born for the cinema only.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-31 | imurminhanh | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-19 | Charles Le | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | Charles Le | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-24 | ghazaleh Basiri | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | fowzan | 56 | view |
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are the main source for many countries However some nations are using alternative energy such as solar power and wind power Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Some people advocate death penalty for those who committed violent crimes Others say that capital punishment is unacceptable in contemporary society 89
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What can be done to make people drink less 95
- Nowadays plastic money replacements such as credit and debit cards are extremely popular even more than banknotes and coins 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nema has various kinds of screen from 3D ,4D to screen X. In the case of 4d cinema...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, moreover, so, well, as to, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1972.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67298578199 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49495346538 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554502369668 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.3885668106 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.466666667 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1333333333 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248140671051 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076984762705 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479507770874 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157191960575 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620509594214 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.