Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The statement mentions that some people believe that technology takes our chances to interact with others. On the contrary, the prompt mentions that other people believe that technology can make more connection between people. I agree that innovation provides unlimited communication ways between people in the whole World.
First of all, it cannot be ignored that technology brings many easy ways for everybody to make connections to the whole world. Imagine a girl who lives and works in Los Angeles, but her whole family members live in Arizona. Definitely, there are many ways to keep contacted with her family. For example, she can easily take a plan only for few hours to see her parents or she can use facetime which is much easier way than booking a flight. Thus, definitely technology make many easy ways for communications especially when there are distances.
In addition, modernization creates many opportunities for human interaction to develop a more professional World. Consider a Dietitian who lives in Sacramento, but she applies for a job in a nursing home in Orange County. It may take time and money for her to go to the multiple job interviews over there, but with technology like Zoom she can easily see and talk to the manager for a job interview. Thus, we cannot ignore that with today's technology human interactions are much easier than before.
On the contrary, some people believe that technology innovations can reduce children or young people connections with others which can be true sometimes. It is understandable that a ten years old boy who wants to play video games or use internet to watch movies all day will not have a chance to connect to his family or even his friends. In this case, modernization does not make any connection for that boy, but we cannot blame the technology for that because it is everybody’s choice to use innovations in good way or bad way.
Unambiguously, today people in different parts of the World have much more connections with each other than before by using technology.
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 59
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another Write a resp 54
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 16
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 58
- Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Although many foods are naturally rich in salicylates food processing companies 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, thus, for example, in addition, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95918367347 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8276997839 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530612244898 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7769679529 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.3125 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370767468744 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131725509509 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0942733744965 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221296864424 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0947832020055 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.