Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Facts are used in every field of study for investigation or making decisions, but they are sometimes misleading. I mostly agree with the claim that information assumed as a fact should not be trusted readily for the reason mentioned (most of the information that people regard as a fact usually turned out to be false ). Also, I contend one more reason in support of the claim in the issue topic. However, the claim might not hold true for every case: sometimes facts are inarguably true.
Firstly, Most of the information we read in an article or newspaper or even course syllabus can be false sometimes. There are numerous examples that bolster the claim that the facts are sometimes mistaken. For example. Previously, the earth is said to be round, but later on, through many investigations and research, the originally thought fact turned out to be falsified. Thus, it can be inferred from the above example that most of the facts initially claimed as a fact are often proved to be false.
Secondly, Many facts are generated without compelling evidence or iota of evidence, and they are most vulnerable to be wrong when carefully judged from various angles. In the history of science, we can find many examples of theories that are being successful in analyzing some issues but later on proved to be wrong when used in different circumstances. Some elements of fluid mechanics initially were touted and used in many fields, but later on, that is found to be unwarranted and obviated later by other scientists.
However, it is not obvious that every fact turned out to be wrong. There are some cases in which facts plays a crucial role to make a wise decision or make a persuasive analysis of any matter. Let us take an example of the police investigation. Police use several facts and evidence about the criminal to identify. Through a rigorous process of examining facts and using them to make several assumptions, it helps them to determine the criminals and arrest those miscreants. Also, many scientists use facts of previous theories to develop new theories or innovations. Thus, not every time the facts are untrue, rather they can be an invaluable asset for analysis.
In conclusion, even though in some circumstances facts are logically treated and use wisely to make important decisions and innovation, due to the falsified nature of most of the facts, which are seemingly true but scrutiny analysis false nature, they should be mistrusted. Thus, because of the above reasons, facts should be mistrusted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-12 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Kamnele | 33 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | IshaanN | 50 | view |
- People spend large amounts of time and money on clothes hairstyles and make up to change their appearance Is it important for people to be concerned about the way they look What are the consequences of focussing on physical appearance Give reasons for you 61
- More people decided to have children in their later age than in the past Why Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- The graph shows data about the average Saturday sales of two bakeries in london in 2010 Summerize the information by selecting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 86
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The pie charts below give data on the spending and consumption of resources by countries of the world and how the population is distributed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main featur 84
- The table below shows how much time males and females spent per day on non work activities in one European country during 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...as a fact usually turned out to be false . Also, I contend one more reason in supp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97872340426 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74359670701 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486997635934 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 679.5 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6900463618 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.3 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306324072931 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0996933103294 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925261286259 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193495968244 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673922443917 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.