the information about government expenditure in five sectors relating to domestic policy in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom in 2009
The table illustrates how Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom spent their government expenditure on five different sectors of domestic policy in the year 2009.
Overall, one can see that 3 nations likely concerned on health than they did with other sectors. In contrast, Environmental protection in the same year had the least spending from all countries.
Looking at the table more closely, it is evidence that both Germany and Italy devoted their expenses on Public Services, with Italy was the most at 8.6 percent, followed by Germany with 6.6 percent. Also, the 2 nations had the similar spending budget on education and economic affairs, each country spent approximately 4 percent on distinct sectors. The UK, as the same as Italy and Germany on the concerning about Economic affairs, but different from using their money on Education and Public Services. In general, it was likely that the UK more focus on Education than the other countries, their budget on this sector was 6.4 percent, whilst public services received 4.6 percent from their government expenditure. Interestingly, health was the most spending category of all countries at approximately 7 percent while the least government budget used for Environment protection, which each country decided under 1 percent for that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-11 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | Tôn Nguyễn Hồng Phúc | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | JayV109 | 49 | view |
- The number of public transit passengers from 1989 to 2009 and bus tram passenger numbers between 2000 and 2008 in Mel 78
- The reasons people in Great Britain had for visiting art museums in the years 1990 and 2000 73
- show the stages and equipment used in the pulp making process and how pulp is used to produce paper 89
- The diagrams show the life cycle of an insect called the cicada 92
- the information about the economic value of international students in the US in 2005 2010 and 2015 The bar graph shows changes in the number of international students from 3 countries in two of those years 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs of domestic policy in the year 2009. Overall, one can see that 3 nations like...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1090.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29126213592 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7728264121 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567961165049 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8684111862 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.25 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196649818295 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944677341132 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146410644349 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187712131706 0.15604864568 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20030168419 0.0819641961636 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 61.2550243902 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.