The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013.
The bar chart illustrates the number of mobile phones sold worldwide by five best selling establishments in three years 2009, 2011 and 2013.
Overall, Nokia is the leading manufacturer in the mobile phone sale in 2009. However, Samsung saw a remarkable rise in the number of handsets purchased over the 5-year period.
It is envident that Samsung vendor just sold well over 200 million mobile phones in 2009, but this figure had increased to approximately 450 million units in the year of 2013. By constrast, in 2009, eventhough Nokia vendor accounted for the highest number of mobile phone sold, there was an downward trend in that statistic by 200 million units in 2013.
From the chart it can be seen that the purchases of mobile phone by Apple, LG and ZTE companies in 2009 were by far less justifiable than the remaining top two brands’ figure. Whilst the handset sale of Apple vendor increased significantly by around 130 million units between 2009 and 2013, LG manufacturer saw a steady drop in the number of purchases and the figure for ZTE brand changed marginally over the period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-21 | PhucHuynh | 100 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-17 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | AYUSH BOTHRA | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-09 | BÙI QUỐC VƯƠNG | 78 | view |
- The charts below show household spending patterns in two countries between 1980 and 2008 62
- The chart below 11
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 73
- The graph below shows electricity production in terawatt hours in France between 1980 and 2012 79
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 289, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... number of mobile phone sold, there was an downward trend in that statistic by 200...
^^
Line 6, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Whilst the handset sale of Apple vendor increased significantly by around 130 mi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92513368984 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61462876245 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566844919786 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8386067885 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.571428571 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329498664524 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162421704579 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0819000160777 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205109716135 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507291753253 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.