Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school. What are the benefits of each system? Which is better?
In this day and age, a range of students is made to attend certain classes when they are 15 years of age, whereas others are demanded to learn various subjects before leaving school. Each of these teaching methods has its own perks. Although an educational institution system with a huge number of subjects can provide diverse knowledge, I totally believe that a narrower range of subjects is better as have more time for other extracurricular activities.
Supporters of the previous educational system may suggest that pupils have access to a broader range of knowledge that they will need later in life. For one, a broad range of holistic curriculums will bring to pupils the possibility to be flexible in several fields which can be a great help for adolescents when they grow up. Take Vietnam as an instance, students aiming at nursing courses in university are only required to have good marks in Maths, Chemistry, and Biology. Nevertheless, the knowledge they have acquired in non-major academic classes such as Art or English can offer them competitive benefits when they apply for an occupation in multiple companies, compared to those who are not acquainted with foreign languages or creativities.
Despite the perks of studying a wide range of academic classes, pupils who learning only an average number of subjects have more time for other purposes than those who just focus on learning in classes. With fewer subjects to learn, they have more extra time either for stress relievers like playing sports or taking a rest or for further researches related to their chosen subjects. The former exercise helps youngsters de-stress and re-energize at school, while the latter is an excellent method to recap the lesson presented in class. According to scientific evidence, these activities improve students' study efficiency and academic achievement, making such an educational system far more superior to one that requires learners to master a variety of subjects.
To summarize, each of these wonderful teaching methods has its own strengths. While the knowledge gained in numerous classes may be valuable, I feel that a study schedule with fewer classes is more advantageous to students who can devote more time to deeper study or leisure.
- The illustrations show how chocolate is produced 11
- The diagram details the process of making clothes from plastic bottles 61
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 70
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008 67
- The table gives information about departments and online stores in Australia in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... a narrower range of subjects is better as have more time for other extracurricula...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, i feel, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19178082192 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76940635505 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558904109589 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.4391368134 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.769230769 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0769230769 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310754146458 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10187842755 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728519561407 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190162377046 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965158606826 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... a narrower range of subjects is better as have more time for other extracurricula...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, i feel, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19178082192 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76940635505 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558904109589 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.4391368134 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.769230769 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0769230769 20.7667163134 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310754146458 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10187842755 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728519561407 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190162377046 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965158606826 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.