Cohabitation is believed to bring huge advantages for young people since it enables them to fully understand each other before deciding to get married.
Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays relationships without marriage have become regular. Many believed that cohabitation brings advantages for getting each other before deciding to get married. But I totally disagree with making love before marriage in the name of knowing each other.
Relationships, live together become common phenomena in this modern world. Though relationships become a common matter, so sex before marriage becomes very intensely acceptable in western socitey. But by the name of getting each other many people to go for relationships only for lovemaking. Usually, in most cases after finishing their inner desire, they used to dump their partner. As a result, the broken partner decided to suicide. Many controversies came that cohabitation is helpful for knowing each other. But sex before marriage brings unstable in society. Unwanted child, suicide, depression is few examples of making love before marriage by the name of getting to know each other.
Finally, cohabitation creates many instabilities in society. In western society the number of single mothers is increasing day by day. For single mothers, their times become tougher to look after their both children and jobs. The number of single mothers is increasing only for cohabitation before marriage by the name of knowing each other well. And the children rise without their father. In most cases their life becomes tougher.
In the conclusion, cohabitation for getting each other before deciding to get married creates so many instabilities in society. For this reason, for may women their life become very tough as single mothers. And the life of many youth become full of depression and heartbreak.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-24 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-30 | mle925 | 81 | view |
| 2021-08-26 | Amna Zeeshan | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-26 | Amna Zeeshan | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | Sajid1410 | 56 | view |
- Cohabitation is believed to bring huge advantages for young people since it enables them to fully understand each other before deciding to get married Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 67
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing 56
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun youth seems to be countable; consider using: 'many youths'.
Suggestion: many youths
...ough as single mothers. And the life of many youth become full of depression and heartbrea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, may, so, well, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43461538462 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76294960731 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473076923077 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6087861429 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.65 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0 20.7667163134 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266491201855 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925582514141 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108541631912 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204383560345 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0901963458036 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.33 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.