The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups who went to the cinema once a month in Great Britain. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares the proportion of people in 4 various age range going to the cinema monthly in Great Britain over a 16-year period.
Overall, the shares of people in 4 age groups who went to the movie once a month followed an upward trend. Also, the rate of people aged 15-24 going to the film monthly was always the highest compared to other age groups.
In 1984, the percentage of the 15-24 age group who went to the movie every month was around 17%, much higher than the rate of people agedup35, at a mere of roughly 1%. The period between 1984 and 2000 witnessed a gradual increase in the proportion of people age 15-24 and 35 and visiting the movie theater monthly, by about 58% and 15% respectively.
Regarding the other categories, initiating at 10% in 1984, the percentage of cinema-goers in the 7-14 age bracket significantly increased to about 37% in 1999 before slightly increasing by 32% in the next year. Meanwhile, the figure for persons in the 25-25 age range experienced an increase to roughly 25% in 1994 before a 5-year period of stability from 1994 to 1999. Over the next 5 years, an increase of approximately 7% was witnessed in the share of people aged 25-35 going to the cinema once a month in 2000.
- The diagrams below show changes in Happy Valley Shopping Centre in 1982 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 68
- The line graph shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 67
- The line graphs below show the production and demand for steel in million tonnes and the number of workers employed in the steel industry in the UK in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
- The chart below gives information about levels of education by age range in Glasgow in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60633484163 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5620371417 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506787330317 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.1284044889 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.25 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219633661483 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118743873362 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692308713862 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156235620595 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455526938143 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.