All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
It is critically important that companies operate efficiently as much as possible and thrive in all their projects. Personally, I beleive that companies should listen to their employees. I feel this way for the following reasons, which i will explore in this essay.
First of all, employees are associated with the company for a very long time. Thus, employees know the pros and cons of the company. For Instance, an employee would have faced an issue with a project and since he knows every detail of the project, he will also know what should have been modified to do it better next time. So, if companies give a chance to an employee he can pitch a better idea for helping the company to work much more efficiently. This scenerio was recpect to "one" employee but when a company gives a chance to all the employees than each and everyone can come up with a new idea. Based on this, I strongly feel that companies should give a chance to employee for the betterment of the company.
Second of all, if companies value their employees by listening to them then they get emotionally connected to the company. If as an employer if I value my employees than they will be loyal to the company, so with this then can truly work hard and help company to achive greater profits. In contrast, if the company trust some other consultants then the employees might not get adjusted to them. It is also possible that they are not willing to do things according to the consultants.Perhaps in future they start searching for other job.Based on this, I strongly feel company should prioritize employees.
However, the other side of the picture also needs to be discussed. Consultants might suggest different ideas whicg the compoyees might not know. For instance, thses consultants would have associated with many companies and they know how to help the company for rising the efficiency. They know how to tweak into these problem and provide a solution. It is always good to have a third person point of view from the outside world. As a result, it is good to take consultants point of view.
On a conclusive note, I strongly feel that companies should listen to their employees. This is because they are connected to the company for the longer time and if the company value them then they will be loyal and work hard.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | Bholuchand | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | bacec | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 83 | view |
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 62
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...is way for the following reasons, which i will explore in this essay. First of...
^
Line 5, column 484, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Perhaps
... do things according to the consultants.Perhaps in future they start searching for othe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Based
...ture they start searching for other job.Based on this, I strongly feel company should...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...efficiency. They know how to tweak into these problem and provide a solution. It is always go...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, thus, for instance, i feel, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75555555556 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67315625529 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451851851852 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.9 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3924243887 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7142857143 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.80952380952 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361817019899 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12200112942 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756854370176 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219961337937 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0217646494854 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.38706741573 83% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.