Some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things. Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it.
In contemporary society, the increasing pervasiveness of the Internet is accompanied by the fact that advertisements play an instrument in attracting customers; while opponents argue that advertising is so ubiquitous and not guaranteed quality of products. To the best of my knowledge, the former point of view is more reasonable for the following reasons.
Firstly, it is note-worthy that the effectiveness of commercials is to supply detailed information about products for buyers. Nowadays, many sociological studies have shown that although it is invisible, advertisement is one of contributive factors to the decision of customers. Therefore, it will be a grave mistake to neglect the fact that the popular trend of technological devices with viral contents of commercials is a strategic approach to potential benefits. For example, Tiki is a famous delivery brand in Viet Nam, which is presented in many music videos of celebrated singers and composers that attracted the interests in a numerous viewers. This example is the illustration of the fact that advertising is able to access the shopping of audiences.
Secondly, the counter-argument raised by objectors to this is that commercials do not allure viewers to buy products, because many advertisers are inclined to exaggerate potential advantages and real functions. This argument could be true to some extent; however, it is incomplete. What they fail to take into account to this is that many commercials operated by professional organizations are dependable as they strictly stick to high demands of buyers. For instance, Apple is the top credible brand that does not depend on advertisements but they succeeded in all innovations, particularly in Iphone, Ipad, Macbook or Airpod. For this example, one can observe that with commerce skills, the public can choose trust-worthy products.
In conclusion, marketing campaigns and advertisements are able to increase consumption and credibility as mentioned above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-02 | LauraTing | 84 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 78 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 56 | view |
| 2024-04-01 | tran quynh | 89 | view |
- The two plans below show the Pancha village in 2005 and 2015 78
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh this advantage 78
- Some people believe that educational qualifications always bring success while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The table below gives information about the level of weekly consumption by different age groups in milk and butter in one European country 73
- The charts below shows the percentage of electricity used by different sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 644, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'viewer'?
Suggestion: viewer
...t attracted the interests in a numerous viewers. This example is the illustration of th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56291390728 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38143516386 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599337748344 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2024304558 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.230769231 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0998812497918 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0354005686345 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367264845943 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0659054671391 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166432827116 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.