Many companies sponsor sports as a way for advertising themselves. Some people think it is good for the world of sports, while others think there are disadvantages to this. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In the modern world, national spending, particularly on its citizens, has been one of the principal features that numerous governments are taking into account. Consequently, this trend has raised a question whether they should consider the elderly or children and teenagers as a first and foremost investment. While many people support the first argument, I am wholeheartedly consistent with the latter one.
There are many easily-seen evidences demonstrating why people believe in the first statement. They often argue that care of old people should be prioritized in the highest place due to their heritages. This is mainly because they have dedicated their lives to make a thriving nation. Likewise, everything we are utilizing at present is the achievements the elderly have striked for. Apart from that, elderly caring somehow reflects the development pace of a country, especially where a high proportion of aged citizens contributes to its population. Japan is cited as an example to prove this since more than a half of its population is made up of the elderly and they are always assured with adequate nutrients, accommodations, health care and services.
On the contrary, I would argue that governments should pay the highest ambition to the expenditure in schooling of young citizens as this is a long-term investment. I would say that practicing this can guarantee further enhancement and high-quality outcomes of manufacturing process because education can provide prospective employees with vital knowledge to adapt with the latest innovation. In addition to this, social peacefulness will be sured and encapsulated. Conflicts, criminals and disparities are often aggravated by young adults, by giving them a green light to a legal career, simply by establishing subsidised fundamental vocational courses, chances for a sustainable occupation are undoubted. Hence, inconsistency between wealth and poverty will be enclosed alongside the diminishment of crimes and social gaps.
To put it simply, while many people believe that it is first and foremost to invest in care of old people, I would argue that expenditures in education of young people should be initially considered. I suggest that governments should make wise measures to conciliate and gain the equity between two contradictory aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-25 | datnguyentienhnvn@gmail.com | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-13 | Thu ne | 89 | view |
| 2020-11-28 | Hà Minh Phương | 89 | view |
| 2020-10-08 | anhthaile07 | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-08 | yenchigbbdhx | 56 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children that message 61
- The charts below shows the percentage is of students joining north west University 84
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- how do you find about the party 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, likewise, so, while, apart from, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49579831933 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1511845618 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591036414566 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5460579846 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.625 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102355287356 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331315546504 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262177043524 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0622928142464 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00495887250415 0.056905535591 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.