As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others think that drivers should cover the costs Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

As the number of cars increases, more money has to be spent on road systems. Some people think the government should pay for this. Others think that drivers should cover the costs. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Recently, the number of cars traveling on roads has been rising sharply, especially in modern and developed countries. Consequently, road systems need large amounts of money for maintenance, construction, and upgrading costs. While some people suggest that the government should finance those works, others believe that drivers should pay for them. Nevertheless, in my opinion, both the government and drivers should share the costs relating to commuting systems, and I will explain my argument further in this essay.
To begin with, there are some reasons the government should pay for the majority of the costs. Firstly, building infrastructures is one of the primary functions of the state. It is widely known that the government charges their citizens with taxes, and the money will then be spent on public purposes, including accommodating traffic systems. Secondly, as the country’s economy largely depends on traffic systems, improving roads would benefit the country. This is because modern traffic infrastructures can enable the transportation of goods in a relatively short time, enhancing productions and trades.
However, drivers also have to be responsible for the road construction fees, based on their types of vehicles and mileages. In some countries, there are roads which were initially in good conditions, break down quickly after few years in use, due to the frequent travel of large lorries and containers. Thus, people who contribute the most to the deconstruction should pay the largest amount of money to maintain the infrastructure. Hopefully, by doing this, roads could be protected from severe damages.
All in all, as vehicle are commuting on roads more often, the increase of costs for traffic systems is inevitable. For the reasons that I discussed in this essay, I believe that those costs should be covered by both the government and people.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-09-26 caigicungduoc 78 view
Essays by user caigicungduoc :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39795918367 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9419487938 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585034013605 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0485533022 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421057198099 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124733811843 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0914020962244 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254748839772 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951068750669 0.056905535591 167% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.