The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010.
The table chart illustrates the value of each product type that export in 2009 and 2010.
Overall, Telecommunity products rose significantly while manufacturing products decreased dramatically, but the total value of 5 products still increased.
First of all, the figure for equipment was about 10.3 billion HK dollars in 2009 then it rose a bit to 11.6 billion HK dollars in the next year, which changed to 13%. Secondly, both Telecommunity and metals products grew enormously from 7.9 and 2.3 billion HK dollars in 2009 to 12.7 and 5.1 billion HK dollars respectively in 2010. These figures changed dramatically to 61% and 122%.
On the other hand, the was a decrease by 1 billion HK dollars in clothing products in 2010, which the proportion of clothing declined to minus 17%. Moreover, the percentage of manufacturing witnessed a huge change to minus 27%, which the figure value decreased to 4 billion HK dollars in 2010.
Lastly, 32 billion HK dollars was the value of total in 5 products in 2009 before rising to 38.4 billion HK dollars in the next year. In addition, this changed the percentage of the overall, which made up 20%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- after leaving school or university young people should choose a job or a career that they love rather than one that pays the best salary to what extent do you agree with this statement 56
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems What are the problems What could be done to solve those problems 61
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which is better 73
- The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, still, then, while, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91191709845 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85192568161 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502590673575 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0206736698 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8888888889 5.23603664747 246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239507546199 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130782768556 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146679101151 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202019462166 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15812502526 0.0819641961636 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.