Claim: An piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.
Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual turns out to be inaccurate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
An information let it be about some research or experiment is always a useful substance in creating something as a whole. A fact or a claim is made by observing observations of a study or experiment. The Claim here says that any information referred to as fact should not be trusted as much of the information which is assumed as a fact turns out to be erroneous. I disagree with the given reason and would like to justify my stance with two reasons.
FIrstly, any information we receive about anything, any subject the first task is to check it's source, from where this information comes and is spreading. The source providing such information maybe some government body so we just can't assume it to be false everytime, they must have studied something before presenting or disclosing it to the laymen. For instance, currrent covid scenario we must need daily updates about the virus in our country, the information about number of cases per day or number of deaths per day is disclosed by the government body as they manage everything so if the number of cases per day rises to 50,000 as a fact we just can't deny it and say it must be false, not accepting such information by some credible source its just bane for us.
Secondly, great astronomers like Galileo were also proved false and information provided by him that the earth revolves around the sun was not accepted by his contempararies and was reprimanded for that. The information which Galileo found, he must have have did some research and revealed such information, he had a profound knowledge about his field. He was also reprimanded for providing such information but later in the timeline everything surrounding the information provided by the Galileo turned out to be true, many astronomers started studying him and respected his work. So by simply denying the information and not trusting it because it was factual does not always proves false the information stated before.
The information which is provided infront of us may be false, may be true it depends upon the sources but it does not mean that beacuse it was referred as a fact we have to mistrust due to the common misconception of it being false. It is also the duty of an individual to decide whether he would completey believe or deny such information without reading about it in first place or read about it, how was the information derived and judging by the intellectual property whether to take it as a truth or false.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-12 | HAN YEBIN | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | Kamnele | 33 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | IshaanN | 50 | view |
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should co 75
- Claim An piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual turns out to be inaccurate Write a response in which you discuss the exte 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...n maybe some government body so we just cant assume it to be false everytime, they m...
^^^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...r day rises to 50,000 as a fact we just cant deny it and say it must be false, not a...
^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: have
...nformation which Galileo found, he must have have did some research and revealed such inf...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ation which Galileo found, he must have have did some research and revealed such inf...
^^^^
Line 5, column 260, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
... which Galileo found, he must have have did some research and revealed such informa...
^^^
Line 5, column 679, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'prove'
Suggestion: prove
... because it was factual does not always proves false the information stated before. ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 427.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77283372365 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80980869944 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475409836066 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 651.6 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.2575611985 60.3974514979 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.769230769 118.986275619 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.8461538462 23.4991977007 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316819183125 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132643429696 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120720382753 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220889163891 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0940144035181 0.0667264976115 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.8420337079 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.