People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
The statement assumes that people who make decisions based on emotions and then justify these decisions with logic are poor decision makers. This assumption may be realistic because hasty decisions while emotional may lead to lack of proper planning, poor judgment and abysmal consequences.
Firstly, Decisions made based on emotions may lead to lack of proper planning and management because an individual may not be thinking about the latter consequences of taking that decision at that particular instance. An example would be a case of an employee that is often reprimanded by her dogmatic and obstinate boss, in a fit of tears decides to quit her job. After her resignation she realizes that she has no other source of income and her bills will be piling over the next few months and even if she tries to justify her actions with logic, the fact remains that her momentary action of quitting without proper planning will lead to financial liabilities.
Also, Decisions made based on emotions could lead to poor judgement as in the case of a female Judge who lets her emotions get the best of her and makes a decision to free a female prisoner who murdered her husband under the guise of self defense without considering other possibilities of the female being emotional unstable or committing the murder deliberately.
Furthermore, Decisions made on a whim can often lead to abysmal consequences, as in the case of a man who decides to cheat on his wife because he suspects she is having an an affair. This decision would affect their marriage in the long run because if his wife was never having an affair, his whimsical decision has consequences that can not be reversed or mollified.
In conclusion, the recommendation that people who make decisions based on emotion and then justify those decisions with logic are poor decision makers may stand proven.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Aishwarya01 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer 50
- Blue Highway and Green Highway 64
- Nowadays many people change jobs quite regularly rather than working in the one company for their entire careers Why do you think this is happening How can companies keep their workers 78
- For a Television station in order to attract more viewers for the program to avoid losing any further advertising revenues it decides to restore the time devoted to weather and local news to its former level 58
- Nowadays many people change jobs quite regularly rather than working in the one company for their entire careers Why do you think this is happening How can companies keep their workers 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es. Firstly, Decisions made based on emotions may lead to lack of proper plan...
^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: an
... wife because he suspects she is having an an affair. This decision would affect thei...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'an' is left.
Suggestion: an; an
... wife because he suspects she is having an an affair. This decision would affect thei...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 313.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98722044728 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75096384197 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504792332268 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.6209506213 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.444444444 118.986275619 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.7777777778 23.4991977007 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.2758426966 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47501715094 0.243740707755 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.260074106346 0.0831039109588 313% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.259492496846 0.0758088955206 342% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363460545139 0.150359130593 242% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.245121625495 0.0667264976115 367% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 14.1392134831 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.