The chart compares the number of people per household by percentage in the UK in 1981 and 2001.
The table chart illustrates the percentage of people living in houses in the UK between 1981 and 2001.
Overall, the proportion of 6 or more, 5, 3 people who stay in houses reduce slightly while only one person and 2 and 4 people rise. Moreover, 2 people living in a house in the UK take the highest percentage in both years.
First of all, in 1981, one person per household in the UK was about 23% then it increased a bit by 3% in 2001. Secondly, 2 people in the same household had 31% in 1981 before rising up to 34% in 20 years later. Thirdly, the figure for 4 people per household in 1981 took to 12% and this figure growth a little by 3% in 2001.
On the other hand, the percentage of 3 people per household reduced by 3% in 2001. While the proportion of 5 people per household witnessed a huge change, which fall sharply to 6% in the same year. Finally, the number of 6 people in the same house was the lowest percentage to 6% in 1981 but this number still decreased dramatically to 2% in 2001.
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 73
- The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 84
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road might cause some problems What are the problems What could be done to solve those problems 61
- some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- more and more people now own cars What are the problems associated with an increase in the usage of private cars How these problems can be solved 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erall, the proportion of 6 or more, 5, 3 people who stay in houses reduce slightl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, third, thirdly, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.20207253886 4.92477711251 85% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45936669146 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492227979275 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.5505043982 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.1111111111 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 5.23603664747 255% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.551154956365 0.215688989381 256% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.241902768535 0.103423049105 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104879854041 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.342714631311 0.15604864568 220% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10666516135 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.08 11.4140731707 62% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.48 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.