The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The figure demonstrates the difference in proportion of households that are owned and the ones that are rented in two countries of United Kingdom, namely, England and Wales within the years 1918 and 2011.
It is overt in the picture that people reduced renting accommodation and augmented the ownership of households during the time period on study. Specifically, the percentage of households that are owned increased from around 22 % to almost 70 % till 2001. It seems the owned accommodations decreased from the start of 21st century till the next decade to about 65 %. However, trend to rent accommodations saw a steep decrease of about 45 % during the 20th century and increased to almost 38 % in the decade from 2001 to 2011.
In an interesting note, the percentage of households that are rented and owned was equal to 50 % in 1971. Moreover, looking at the trend in the decade after 21st century, as the trend to own a house decreased, the proportion of housing that are rented increased.
To sum up, it can be inferred from the diagram that as people started to own houses, idea to rent the accommodation has reduced throughout the century.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-23 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2023-12-31 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-31 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-26 | lethianhthu | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | Jessie1526 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The following appeared on the Website Science News Today In a recent survey of more than 5 000 adolescents the teens who reported eating the most meals with their families were the least likely to use illegal drugs tobacco or alcohol Family meals were als 59
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position you should co 66
- The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your po 16
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 58
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90206185567 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86170840583 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2147300965 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.875 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221498795985 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102602442409 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046874858346 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136231148083 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434811015779 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.