In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
In the near future, automated driving technology would appear in all vehicles, and human drivers would be redundant. Personally, this wind of change could offer multiple merits and overcome its disadvantages.
On the one hand, there are some concrete benefits of using this cutting-edge technology. Firstly, automated vehicles could help effectively prevent accidents. AVs programmed with sophisticated software and hardware could eliminate human errors. Major culprits of accidents such as drunk, speeding or distracted driving would become a thing of the past. Therefore, it could eradicate accidents, making roads a safer place. Secondly, AVs could increase traffic efficiency. With the help of AI (Artificial Intelligence), vehicles could communicate with each other in real-time. Cars are able to travel more efficiently and calculate the optimal route to take and avoid bumper-to-bumper traffic. Furthermore, most self-driving cars are more eco-friendly by shifting from fossil fuel to electrical energy, therefore, decreasing the emissions released to the atmosphere and contributing to a green-growth development society.
On the other hand, society might cast doubt on the efficiency and safety of this novel tendency. However, technology is innovating and renewing day by day. Such remaining issues, flaws and worries could be addressed eventually in the near future. Looking at the reality, Tesla is showing unarguable advantages compared to other rival manufacturers in the race of prevailing the market share of the American automobile industry, proving the superiority of driverless vehicles.
To recapitulate, even though the self-driving mechanism is still at the initial stages, I hold a firm belief that the virtual-drivers era is inevitable, requiring the acclimatization of each individual.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- In some countries come criminal trials in law courts are shown on television so that the general public can watch them Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 89
- In some countries small town centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out of town stores As a result people without cars have limited access to out of town stores and it may result in an increase in the use of cars Do y 89
- Some people think climate change has a negative impact on business while others think that it provides more business opportunities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favor of the 95
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86363636364 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2967604518 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670454545455 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.9100116099 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.75 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0849832484129 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0229482817606 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281148455847 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0432115418751 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253953711246 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.41 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86363636364 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2967604518 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670454545455 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.9100116099 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.75 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0849832484129 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0229482817606 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0281148455847 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0432115418751 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0253953711246 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.41 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.