Nowadays, sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sports people and companies involved both financially and other ways. Is this a positive or negative development for sport?
Many believe sport is a famous industry that generates high profits for both players and corporations involved both economically and so on. From my point of view, this is more of positive development, I will explain clearly in my essay.
On the one hand, receiving high income bring lots of benefits to sports. Firstly, money will be the foundation for better tournaments and facilities for both audiences and athletes. For example, The Premiere League always announces new features and adjustments in pre-season to attract more audiences which produce them money and improves the league’s quality. Secondly, when people find their careers rewarding enough, they are more likely to behave better and pull out the greater motivation for the upcoming season. Last but not least, pouring lots of money and support into the industry is another significant advantage. Borussia Dortmund which is a prospect group that has settled in Vietnam recently, allocated thousands of youngsters to experience and training in their academies, moreover, they provide students with professional curriculums and training lessons, hence, the Vietnamese national team has become much stronger.
On the other hand, despite its significant merits, it also comes up with major demerits. For example, some soccer players will use their images to promote unknown entrepreneurs to increase their money bags without thinking of consequences to their fans those who believe and attempt those detrimental products. Nevertheless, there will be a lack of fund mismanagements and sportspeople being banned for using drugs to enhance their performances. Lastly, corruption and inflations are included. Needless to say, The FIFA World Cup in 2002 was one of the most shameful and unforgettable moments in the history of football, relying on being the World cup held country, Korea used the money to graft the whole tournament.
In conclusion, having considered both views, I think it is a positive development for sport with those aforementioned advantages. Nevertheless, the next decade could be the period that is going to demolish the foundation of sports which was a quintessential and marvelous industry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-09 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-09 | nguyenngothuyduong | 61 | view |
| 2021-12-09 | DoDtt | 93 | view |
| 2021-11-27 | Jaydee1774 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-27 | Jaydee1774 | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human s life Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage at school Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 81
- Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value the quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are done alone Do you agree or disagree 87
- Nowadays sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sports people and companies involved both financially and other ways Is this a positive or negative development for sport 93
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48961424332 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98827642347 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623145400593 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2072252302 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4666666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231968602134 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730546140103 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829906716266 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157824759674 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793383361002 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, lastly, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48961424332 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98827642347 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623145400593 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2072252302 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4666666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231968602134 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730546140103 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829906716266 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157824759674 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793383361002 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.