In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is true that a small percentage of the total population can have a high income in some nations and people argue that this helps country develop while some people think governments should prohibit salaries above a certain level. In my opinion, I agree with the first viewpoint and this essay will give suitable explains with examples.
First of all, there are a lot of advantages of individuals earn high salaries in a country. The first benefit is that having high salaries help their ability increase significantly since they have motivated to do their jobs as much as possible. For example, people who work at offices, huge salaries create motivation for everyone to work harder to achieve this amount of money, which is not only improves companies development but also increases the economy of the country. Secondly, when people have a high income they have changes to invest many aspects and they also need to pay a lot of taxes, which governments can use that money to invest important things. For instance, in China, wealthy people have to pay about 2% their property to governments so governments can use it to upgrade infrastructure or invest in technology, and so on.
On the other hand, If governments decide to limit people's salaries, it will cause some problems to the country. The first disadvantage is that It makes people do not want to work effectively because they do not need to work hard but still earn that income. Therefore, people become lazier and do not want to develop or improve their skills. In addition, when a nation controls the salary ranks, they might witness the issue that many talented people will move to other regions for better opportunities. This declines talented people that nation has so the nation will be hard to develop and rise the economy.
In conclusion, giving high salaries plays an important role in the economic development of a country so I believe that governments should not ban salaries above a certain level but encourage people to earn higher income instead.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-04-08 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
2023-10-16 | BoyClazz | 89 | view |
2023-10-16 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
2022-08-20 | lucynton | 84 | view |
2022-03-21 | quynh123445 | 84 | view |
- after leaving school or university young people should choose a job or a career that they love rather than one that pays the best salary to what extent do you agree with this statement 56
- The given charts give information about the number of students at university in the UK from 1991 to 2001 government spending and the types of family economic background they came from in 1991 82
- the charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 73
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92105263158 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64653482407 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505847953216 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.4226022647 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.461538462 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3076923077 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06120827912 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.351834507284 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130234191313 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106400352588 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254349601478 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862177137435 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.