In many countries, a small number of people earn extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some people think that awarding huge remuneration to little proportion of people is assumed well for nation, while others say it should be officially restricted. Partially, I consent to the same perspective for reasonable points, which I will elaborate in the forthcoming paragraph.
One the one side, those who oppose to this highlight that the growing number of crime rate committed by lower-middle class is aroused by millionaires flaunting their wealth, thus the unsafe situation is occurring in one particular area, especially known for tourist attraction. This happens to Kim Kardashian, American socialite, who was robbed in Paris with a loss of $10million (jewellery) after posting in her Instagram. In addition, extremely salaries create social gap between the rich and the poor. It can be seen that there has been different service, almost in all aspects. In the health realm, wealthy people receive VIP access and other health insurance.
On the other side, those who propose rich society endowing a nation opine that the presence of affluent people will increase economic growth by paying taxes from their amenities so as to eventually achieve prosperity. Cited by UK Government, the parliament enacts revenue taxes of 45% per year up to £150,000. Furthermore, the personages frequently donate their wealth and support those in need. This charity will reduce poverty by covering many aspects (education, health, and research development). According to Los Angeles Times, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation donates approximately US$5 millions in 2022, and ameliorate global issue since 2000.
Overall, it seems to me that awarding extreme salaries to some people are worth implementing because of the positive impacts which will be able to enhance economic development and support those in need to procure better quality of lives. This is as long as society remains in a balance social status.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-08 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | BoyClazz | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-16 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-20 | lucynton | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-21 | quynh123445 | 84 | view |
- Social media is gradually replacing in person face to face contact with many people worldwide Do the benefits of social media outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Low price airlines lack most of the conveniences of normal air plane flights However the prices of the tickets are usually lower Discuss negative and positive aspects of having lower rates of air plane tickets for travellers Provide specific reasons and e 67
- Nowadays people tend to have children at an older age Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 78
- In more and more countries people choose to give money on special occasions rather than personally giving gifts Why might this be the case Is it a positive or negative development 67
- More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes cars and other items What are the reasons for this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m, wealthy people receive VIP access and other health insurance. On the other ...
^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...th by paying taxes from their amenities so as to eventually achieve prosperity. Cited by...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'aspects'' or 'aspect's'?
Suggestion: aspects'; aspect's
...ty will reduce poverty by covering many aspects education, health, and research develop...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, thus, well, while, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3779264214 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81500740082 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675585284281 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6018022747 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.857142857 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171403237346 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490804808928 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504549950068 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104259027392 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362688068878 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.