It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people. We can learn just as much from books, films and the internet. Do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that traveling to specific destinations is unnecessary because books, films, and the internet enable people to understand the culture of others. While this view has its own justification, I firmly argue that it is better for people to experience cultures directly.
The first explanation is that when going for a trip to places, people can have practical experience which they can not get through books, films or the internet. It means that they can have an opportunity to get exposed to different cultures and indigenous people by their own view. A prime example is that if a person comes to Viet Nam, they can have a chance to make pottery or craftworks by their own hands and evaluate how difficult it is. Meanwhile, seeing cultures through entertainment media only provides people with superficial knowledge and ignores specific information. As a consequence, they will have their own assessments and experiences without relying on others’ subjective standpoints.
Another benefit of traveling directly to places is that people can widen their knowledge about their surroundings to the best of their abilities. It is obvious that some movies, travel books or websites are currently out-of-date which leads to wrong details and controversies about other cultures. For instance, when coming to a nation, visitors can learn what the locals actually wear, how they speak and can eliminate inaccurate assumptions in old books or the internet. Thus, these explicit observations may play an important role in people's education path or research field.
To wrap up, although an ample source of information about cultural diversity can be provided via books, movies or internet access, I highly recommend that if people want to know firmly about a culture, taking a trip to that destination is the best way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | nguyennhathuy | view | |
| 2023-09-14 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | transcendenceeee | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | chips_0506 | 87 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | Manideep Macherla | 78 | view |
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 67
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- TOPIC 5 Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- TOPIC 2 With the rise of e books comes the decline in paper books Some people see this as a good forward step while others do not What are the positive and negative effects of this trend 84
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 580, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oples education path or research field. To wrap up, although an ample source of ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25255972696 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91548693463 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59385665529 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6249762988 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229839246921 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813700764042 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368388427379 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132270911957 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459933943772 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.