Some people think that the best way to be successful in life is to get a university education. Others disagree and say that nowadays this is no longer true. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Many people argue that the education system at universities is the optimum choice for students to be successful in the future. However, others, hold that this point of view is no longer appropriate in recent years. In this essay, I will discuss both these views and show why I am in favor of the former.
On the one hand, it is understandable that a university degree does not have the same influence as it used to be in the past. Their rationale is that there are numerous jobs that do not require university certification and are still able to be successful. Take streamers on social platforms for example, as these attractive online programs are very famous nowadays, people can make a living on them easily by attracting subscribers for their own channel. However, not all streamers are able to succeed in their career as this is a tendentious job and has many competitors. As a result, it costs time and effort to survive in this entertaining field.
On the other hand, I am convinced that the university educational system is the best way to help students conquer their lifetime achievements. One reason is that university certification brings students more opportunities than those who dropouts of school as the massive amount of knowledge they learn will help them get a better job with a higher salary. Moreover, universities provide college students with many courses helping them reach their full potential. Take soft skills courses, for example, students can improve their capability of presenting, communicating, and leading which are useful in societies nowadays.
In conclusion, there are good reasons to believe that universities are not the only option for students to have a successful life. Therefore, it is my view that a college degree brings various advantages and opportunities for students to succeed in the future.
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06907894737 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96162077723 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546052631579 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4092780154 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.071428571 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208379648124 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730830492995 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052400945044 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13352647485 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806997929446 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.