Many people are now spending more and more time traveling to work or school. Some people believe that this is a negative development while others think there are some benefits. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have divergent views as to whether spending longer time commuting to the workplace or school is beneficial or harmful. This essay aims to analyze both sides of this argument and then I will give my own perspective which is that traveling time should be shorter as people can have more spare time for other tasks.
On the one hand, one of the major benefits which is derived from taking longer time for getting to work, school is the admiration of the world around us. Indeed, a long trip to an office or academic institution can also be a longer exposure to the outside world, when most of our time is spent online. Consequently, this can be a surprisingly good way to get out of the cyberworld and see what is actually happening in the society. For example, we can interact with people who have varying linguistic and academic backgrounds taking the same bus sharing about their countries, cultures to learn new knowledge.
On the other hand, more spare time to do other tasks is undoubtedly a discernible advantage of shortening commute time to work or school. In fact, people have a substantial volume of work that needs more effort and time nowadays, especially for those who have a family with a newborn baby as pressure can come from how to organize time to finish both their stressful workload while still maintaining an enjoyable family life. Consequently, with shorter time spent on traveling, people can reduce the pressure from daily life as well as gain more positive feelings by taking time for friends and family.
In conclusion, I believe both sides have their own merits. On balance, it is my opinion that traveling time between home and workplace, school should not be long. This is because it is my firm belief that travelers can spend more quality time on other works and interests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-29 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | Nguyễn Ngọc Phương Vy | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-03 | huhuhuhu123 | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-23 | Taytor2609 | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-25 | dqnghuy | 73 | view |
- Many young people now know more about international pop and movie stars than famous people in the history of their countries What are the causes Give solutions to increase the number of people to know about famous people in history 65
- The charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 78
- Some people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Others believe that there are health benefits of living in the cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 61
- Some people believe that planning for the future is a waste of time because they think that focusing on the present is more important To what do you extent agree or disagree 61
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will no longer be necessary because people can see historical objects and works of art by using a computer Do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
People have divergent views as to whether spending longer time commuting to the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...s that traveling time should be shorter as people can have more spare time for oth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, consequently, if, so, still, then, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81469648562 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59972823578 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543130990415 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.487766211 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.583333333 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298281763771 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120339369267 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738318126874 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207302397125 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787048671593 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.