Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Increasing the cost of fossil fuels is concerned to be the optimal method to tackle the worldwide environmental issue. From my point of view, I partly concur to this statement and I am going to mention some helpful measures.
Firstly, the expensive price of fuels is taken into account as an effective way to reduce the spread of pollution. The plethora of factories run a higher risk of utilizing the renewable resources to generate the electricity such as wind, solar energy,... which prevent the contribution of toxic gas emissions. Secondly, the existing substantial amount of fuels is likely to be on the scarcity, which is considered to be the reserved sources for each nation. As a result, promoting the high-priced fuels with the campaign not to overuse gasolium to provoke the lack of natural resources.
Nevertheless, there is a flew of outstanding approach to achieve the conservation. Firstly, a viable solution to this problem is for the government to enforce the legistation to promote the limited use of biodegradable packaging such as the plastic bags which is one of the roof reasons to worsen the environmental problems. Secondly, the public awareness is of the great significance to decrease the detrimental impact of global warming. Citizens having the foundation knowledge to the seriousness of the climate change absolutely take meaningful and lawful actions on maintaining the sustainable development like avoiding disposing of litter in the rivers or lakes which is the threat of a marine ecosystem.
To sum up, raising the price of the coal is not the most feasible solution to address the problems associated to the environment. To my mind, the government as well as the authority should take full the advantage of cutting-edge technology to propagate the higher levels of natural depletion and launch campaign to encourage individuals to join hand protecting the green ecosystem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-02-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime Many people think that having more police on streets is the only way to reduce crime To what extent do you agree 56
- Every day millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world Why do you think this is happening And how can we solve this problem 89
- Some people say that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 64
- Some countries are struggling with an increase in the rate of crime Many people think that having more police on streets is the only way to reduce crime To what extent do you agree 84
- Some people think that the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 250, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...e electricity such as wind, solar energy,... which prevent the contribution of tox...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1603.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22149837134 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10483432414 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583061889251 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9851129135 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.307692308 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12001591413 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377714655965 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436021422498 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694988216226 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369460021989 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.