Students should pay the full cost for their own study because university education benefits individuals rather than society To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Students should pay the full cost for their own study, because university education benefits individuals rather than society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is claimed that students should be invested in money for their own tuition because tertiary education brings definite advantages for the individuals rather than the general public. I am not supportive of this statement.
Firstly, enforcing pupils to pay their gull cost for their learning is more likely to diminish the learning opportunities of them particularly the have-nots but gifted students. With the ongoing pressures of day-to-day life as well as the financial burden, those who have no faculty to pay could experience an unfavorable mood which has an adverse impact on academic achievements. The most principle example of this matter may be that those who find difficulty in making ends meet and for their study are corced to drop out of school. As a consequence, the proportion of well-cultivated students run a higher risk of lessening drammatically.
Secondly, allocating no scholarships which is a bedrock for the effective promotion for the outstanding lower class is a testament for an awful high-school education system. It is supposed that students will be the major skilled workforce of their country in the future. Regardless of what job they take after graduation, they will repay the government for its investment in them by paying a considerable tax contribution to the country, which will allow the country to continue to spend in future social protection challenges. Thus, being receipt of exceeding investment for students' tuition fee or providing studentships is completely obligatory.
Bring up a rear, governments do not pay a tuition fee for students trigger some aforementioned disadvantages. It is advisable to promulgate the legislation about the finance clauses suitable to school-aged children living conditions.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-05 vidung 90 view
2023-08-22 Holi 11 view
2023-08-21 Holi 56 view
2023-08-20 HoaiAn123 56 view
2022-08-04 Hanabi 73 view
Essays by user ngannguyen2408 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ges for the individuals rather than the general public. I am not supportive of this statement....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42490842491 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22403840659 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648351648352 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2725569841 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.416666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252107421035 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080882335302 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802970842202 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154285307005 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750141922556 0.056905535591 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.