Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots.
Is this a negative or positive development?
Robots – the groundbreaking step of humankind’ achievements – are proved to be more and more helpful in almost every field nowadays. The emergence of these automatons thus have paved the way for convenience in arduous labor, and their use has become prevailing in society. As far as I am concerned, the implematation of automatons would introduce both positive and negative impacts in the long run.
In relation to the advantages, there are two prime points. First, robots can replaced people in dangerous working conditions. In the past, workers performed tasks in underground mines and constructions sites, which means their lives were always potentially at stake. Therefore, those undertaking perilous work often feared the hidden danger in such places. Now as technology has trascended to a new era, robots are deployed to take the hard parts. With exceptional strength and endurance, these automated machines can perform tasks in unsafe zones with acute precision effortlessly, facilitating the speed of overall schemes. The other good point is that robots are perfectly suitable for repetitive and monotonous chores, which alleviates the stress in housework. After a long hectic day, no householder wants to arrive home doing tedious and stressful tasks but lying down relaxingly and having the job done by someone else. Automatons, in this case, are ideally perfect for this designation.
That said, the prevalent invasion of robots would also induce negativity in the labor world. The most detrimental impact is that hundreds of manual workers would be unemployed by robotic replacement. However skilled a handicrafts worker is, he cannot make products as accurately and meticulously as a specialized robot can. However strong a physical worker is, his power is not as much as that of a construction robot. Besides, the automatons have no feelings, which implies that they do not comment or ask for days-off. Having both accuracy and strength but no perception, they are more favorable in selection towards employers. As a consequence, plenty of manual job positions have vanished and people majoring hard labor have been struggling since robotic implementation.
In summary, it is undeniable that robots are of significance as dangerous and boring tasks can be handled by them, yet one huge negative point would appear: the increase of unemployment. I think all governments in the world should propose a plan helping workers so that they can control the robots but not the other way round.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-11 | transcendenceeee | 73 | view |
2023-08-04 | pwlihnkt | 89 | view |
2023-07-29 | quan12341234 | 61 | view |
2023-04-17 | caigicungduoc | 84 | view |
2023-02-04 | hungdung2507 | 73 | view |
- Most urgent issues can only be solved by international corporations Do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph gives information about the number of people in Australia who used Chinese Arabic Italian or Greek as their first mother tongue Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 77
- School should not force children learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 78
- Some people think students should study the science of food and how to prepare it Others think students should spend time on important subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 9 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 396 350
No. of Characters: 2050 1500
No. of Different Words: 244 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.461 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.177 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.879 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 150 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 113 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 84 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 62 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.659 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.524 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.254 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.254 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.036 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5