Some people believe that it is the best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In some parts of the world, difficulties always exist in our daily life, for example, the feeling of job discomfort, or even the bad living conditions because of financial issues. Some people believe that it's better to accept those unhappy situations, whereas naysayers dispute to encourage trying and improving worse circumstances. From my standpoint, I support the idea of changing from bad situations to becoming better ones.
On the one hand, sometimes accepting the bad conditions is the best solution. During the economic crisis, the average income will be declined, while the food and houses price is steadily increasing because of the higher petrol and other energy costs. People who are suffering from this condition with a shortage of money will feel unsatisfied, however, all of their complaints will be nonsense. Besides, there are several adversities at working place too, where the newcomers always have the feeling of resentment. However, in some situations, the more pressure the new ones suffer from, the more knowledge and experiences they gain step by step. Therefore, trying not to refuse our life in certain circumstances will not be harmful, but even beneficial.
On the other hand, the idea of directly facing and encountering adversities will be the best choice and result in significant benefits. For instance, the businessman who is on the edge of bankruptcy will lose all their property, their family will have to deal with the worst living condition ever, and it also influences the staff as well as workers. If the leader strives to rebuild their company, many problems will be addressed.
In conclusion, whenever encountered with problems, the controversy between two beliefs, accepting or not. In my personal experience, I approve to try as much as to change worse things, however, in particular situations, we have to accept those difficulties.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-09 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
| 2024-01-23 | hau le | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | kheradpishe | 56 | view |
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 78
- Some poeple think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both view and give y 89
- The map below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 78
- the graph below shows trends in U S meat and poultry consumption 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27333333333 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89582841726 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606666666667 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8301790768 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147976229364 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515580214428 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501946776845 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904103349538 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694099088988 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.