Do you agree or disagree, it is a waste of money for a government to fund space travel.
Space travel, an eternal dream pursued by many people, has been in the limelight recently and provoked a heated discussion centering on whether space travel is worth the investment. In many people's opinion, spending money on space travel is useless. Contrary to their views is my perspective that it is not a waste of money for a government to fund space travel. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explain in the following part.
What must be prioritized is that space travel places humans as beneficiaries. To be more specific, many space programs provide a lot of methods to solve problems, such as famine, on the Earth. Take China as an example. Shengzhou No.1, the first manned spacecraft in China, took various corn seeds to space in 2003, and two types of them doubled their yields after being exposed to space rays for two weeks. Later, these two kinds of seeds were brought back to the Earth and planted widely in China, and numerous people appreciated their good taste and high yields. Up to now, planting these seeds has been the most effective way to solve the problem of famine in Henan, a region with a huge population in the North of China. Therefore, I believe that space travel can benefit people a lot and is not a waste of money.
What is equally important is that space travel can boost the economy of a country. In detail, not only does space travel create numerous jobs, but it also generates tax income for the government. I can think of no better illustration than the statistic. NASA, an independent agency responsible for the space program in the United State, indicated in its 2021 economic impact report that NASA created more than 320,000 positions, such as engineers and industrial designers, and generated 7 billion tax income in America. The expert from NASA asserted that the investment, which was only 0.5% of the federal budget, was worthwhile due to the significant economic output annually. Accordingly, I reckon that it is not a waste of money for the government to fund space travel.
Admittedly, the government can also spend the budget on providing food for the poor or increasing the tax. However, those methods can not last long, and space travel is more likely to solve people's problems thoroughly due to the rich resources in space and the huge amounts of jobs and taxes it can create. Thus, I still hold the belief that it is not a waste of money for the government to fund space travel.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that it is not a waste of money for the government to fund space travel.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-01 | wqx | 71 | view |
| 2022-12-01 | wqx | 70 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | xinxindiandeng | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | xinxindiandeng | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-20 | xinxindiandeng | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement competition with friends usually has negative effects on friendships 70
- Do you agree or disagree it is a waste of money for a government to fund space travel 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement competition with friends usually has negative effects on friendships 70
- Do you agree or disagree it is a waste of money for a government to fund space travel 76
- Do you agree or disagree it is a waste of money for a government to fund space travel 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, while, i feel, i reckon, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2115.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 447.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73154362416 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56574488399 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501118568233 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8442858611 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.714285714 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394095864161 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158650233939 0.076458572812 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173845715683 0.0737576698707 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307728574018 0.150856017488 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121690446287 0.0645574589148 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.