Some people think that the government should provide free education at every level. However. some say individuals should pay for their university education.
Some believe that higher education requires tuition fees. While many agree with the notion of improving facilities requires money, I believe policymakers should give free education at all levels due to accessing a large funding source.
Facilities improvements are one of the things expected following the obligation to pay for university fees, supporting better outcomes of the learning process. Simply put, the more established the facilities are, the more students can explore their research which results in more cutting-edge findings. For instance, a 20% increase in cancer treatment journal volumes was found within two decades at the Harvard Medical School after raising students' tuition fees by 10% annually to purchase medical technologies. However, this raises the barrier to access to education for the privileged ones only.
The government should grant free access to education, enlarging the opportunities for underprivileged children to top-quality education to improve their life. As the executive has a large amount of money, endless support can be given to the teaching and learning activities at formal institutions without requiring students for fees. For example, A survey done by the Ministry in Sweden in 2018 stated that the increase in education expense allocation towards all schools across Sweden resulted in a 20% dip in the economic gap rate. It has been found that free education helps more than 10.000 underprivileged students to access top facilities at school, supporting them in gaining skills needed for the workforce.
To sum up, although universities are argued should not be free due to facilities improvement, I believe that as having a big source of money, the government should provide free education at all levels. However, this needs to be strictly supervised due to the corruption act's threat.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-24 | aikzat | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-24 | aikzat | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-18 | ujjwalsatyam9211@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2021-04-01 | happyhappy256 | 56 | view |
| 2021-03-14 | fowzan | 73 | view |
- Some people think it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis and swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The bar chart shows the average number of hours per week that men and women spend doing activities around the home 84
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 61
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways governments and individuals can tackle these problems 73
- Social Media Effects 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...he Harvard Medical School after raising students tuition fees by 10% annually to purchas...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed due to the corruption acts threat.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49122807018 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93917826134 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585964912281 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8975686739 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.416666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301741669602 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110402255208 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854503172191 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187869523423 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497931377034 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...he Harvard Medical School after raising students tuition fees by 10% annually to purchas...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed due to the corruption acts threat.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49122807018 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93917826134 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585964912281 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8975686739 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.416666667 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301741669602 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110402255208 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854503172191 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187869523423 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497931377034 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.