The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
There is old believe that the reflection of the society is made by the people living in that society and especially the leader or the role model of the society. Prompt suggest that in order to evaluate the nature of the society a critical analysis of the character of the men and women in the society is the best way. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the prompt and claim that the person who is chosen as society’s role model reflects the whole nature and character of society and is explained through following three reasons
From the long period of time the society is being reflected by the leader or the nation is being reflected by the king of the country. However, some of the opponents are always to advocate that the leader cannot be the reflection of the society as the nature of the each and every person of the society may be different to the leader. However, it is seen from the long time that the leader or role model totally reflects the society’s character. For instance, Adolf hitler was the one of the tyrannical leaders of the Germany who completely devasted the world In the search of power: he was chosen by the people of Germany as their leader through complete voting system. So, from this example we could conclude that the nature of the people of the country Germany was commensurate with that of Adolf Hitler, So, they were also tyrannical in manner.
Furthermore, Abraham Lincoln who was also one of the leaders chosen by the people; he was totally in support of the democracy and the freedom of the people, which also suggested that the Abraham Lincoln who was elected by the people reflected the nature of its people as aloof from tyrannical and were in support of freedom of people.
Similarly, there was a society located in the state where all the people were out of the disciplinary manner and the crime rate was also high. Daily there used to be the news of the drunkard harassing the girls. The crime of murder for money. There used to be quarrel among the women’s for the petty things. They used to contempt and derogate each other. While looking to the leader of the such society he was also of the same manner. He used to do corruption in the government level and he used to disparage the people coming to tell their problems and used to always fights with his government colleagues. So, this example of the leader and the society completely suggest that the both people and the leader of the society were both evil minded and immoral
Coming to conclusion, of course there may be some opponents who like argue on this reason by claiming that the monopoly of the political parties may have made the people of the country obligated to select the person who are not of their manner or who is immoral manner, which might not be the case in the context of their nature and their nature may be totally different. This might be the case in some society or the country but is not true in the most of the case. As while electing it is the power of the people to vote and they can give the vote to the people who can feel their sentiment and who are commensurate with their manner. If the candidate are not as per their choice than the people also have the right to not to give the vote to person. So, the role model of a society is completely a reflection of the character of the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils the petrified remains of ancient organisms ever since the eighteenth century In recent years however the sale of fossils particularly of dinosaurs and other large vertebrates has grown into a big bus 68
- Repenomamus robustus was not an active hunter of dinosaurs Repenomamus was a mammal in the early Cretaceous period and its fossils were found in the lagerst tte of the Yixian Formation in the Liaoning province of China There are three reasons that Repenom 73
- Benton City residents have adopted healthier lifestyles A recent survey of city residents shows that the eating habits of city residents conform more closely to government nutritional recommendations than they did ten years ago During those ten years loca 62
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 15, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... following three reasons From the long period of time the society is being reflected by the l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ed by the king of the country. However, some of the opponents are always to advocate that t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 355, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ed to contempt and derogate each other. While looking to the leader of the such socie...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, similarly, so, while, as to, for instance, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 19.5258426966 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 93.0 58.6224719101 159% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2726.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 608.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48355263158 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9656475924 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33654536701 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.34375 0.4932671777 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 886.5 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 116.378305538 60.3974514979 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.3 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167861912361 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654422293587 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07564612472 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113938682768 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0996229919564 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.3 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.8971910112 147% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.