Many manufactured food and drink products contain high level of sugars which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar.
Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, people’s daily consumption of sugar has been alarmingly threatening, surpassing the recommended standard from medical experts. This is mainly due to the high amount of sugar contained in food and beverages produced by companies. It is said that these products should be more expensive for people to use less sugar. From my perspective, I disagree with the given statement.
On the one hand, it is indisputable that sugar has detrimental effects on people’s health, causes serious medical problems, and threatens individuals’ lives. To be more specific, sugar is one of the main factors which leads to overweight and obesity in teenagers and adults, creating sedentary lifestyles and an unactive society. Moreover, sugar is a key reason for the increasing number of diabetes patients. As it is widely known, more and more people are exposed to diabetes, concerningly at early ages of life. This will lay pressure on the medical system as well as people’s annual budget for decent treatment. Therefore, it is encouraged to make sugar-based products less reachable to people with a view to obscuring the feasibility of people’s catching dangerous health problems.
However, on the other hand, there are ways of curbing sugar consumption without having to raise the prices of sugary products, which are more effective for both manufacturers and customers. First and foremost, laws and regulations should be enacted to limit the number of sweetened products purchased by obese and diabetes patients. In addition, introducing alternative choices of sugar-free beverages or artificial sweeteners would play a pivotal role in decreasing serious health cases, which eventually improves the social health condition.
In conclusion, despite some compelling explanations for raising the prices of sugary products, I believe there are other proper approaches in solving the current problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-22 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-05 | MEBC Class | view | |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 73
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 88
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58620689655 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03774119725 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8469051102 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336516443476 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108819553281 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791016452785 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181349356817 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985291754417 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.