Housing areas with taller buildings or building houses on a wider area of land. What solution is better?
In the present millennium, the majority of the urban areas are expanding accommodations vertically while other cities prefer to build housings horizontally for their residents. Personally, I believe that apartments held superior benefits compared to the low-rises for several reasons.
Firstly, tall buildings solve the issue of land shortage, especially in densely populated municipal areas. People are flocking to megalopolis due to various reasons such as employment, entertainment, and educational opportunities, resulting in strain on the land resources. As a consequence, vertical planning has become the only choice in these big cities. Some people may suggest expanding the city into the adjacent areas. However, facilities focused at the city center attract dwellers staying in proximity to this place. For example, New York and Shanghai are metropolitan cities where establishing individual residence is literally impossible due to the increased inhabitants. As a result, they only establish multi-story mansions to handle this problem.
Secondly, high-rises are considerably more cost-effective. A house constructed on land includes the price of construction materials and that of the piece of land itself, not to mention the position of the spot. The closer it is to the city center, the higher the price will be. In big cities, where people are already under great burdens from high pricing, cheaper shelters are considered to be appealing and more affordable. For example, in Vietnam, a small house of 50m2 on land can be sold for 4.5 billion dong, while the cost of an apartment of the same area is only around 2 billion dong.
In conclusion, I believe that building tall houses is more advantageous because not only can it allocate a multitude of homes for civils, but it also reduces the cost to own a house compared to traditional single houses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-12 | rika205 | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-17 | buiminhduc | 11 | view |
| 2021-12-17 | buiminhduc | 11 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | lilin_ | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | rafsanfardin | 56 | view |
- School should not force children to learn a foreign language To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- Some people believe that the government should ban dangerous sporting activities while others think that people have the freedom do whatever sports they choose 78
- If people could choose between a life without working or a life spending too much time working people would choose a life without work To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 84
- In some countries few young people go to classical music concerts or play classical music Why Should more young people be encouraged to attend and learn 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37201365188 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07516297683 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621160409556 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5387093734 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.933333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189138255921 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512446750099 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712127523179 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121944122368 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440681845291 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.