According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual

Essay topics:

"According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the last year. Clearly, the content of these reviews is not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not in the quality of our movies but with public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater quantity of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."

The prompt says that budget allocation for advertising will solve the problem of viewership as it will create awareness in the people. On the surface, It seems to be a logical solution but some of the information given is either insufficient or flawed.
Investors should take a closer look and determine all the factor involved before reaching a conclusion
Firstly, the argument says that fewer people have attended in the past year than in any other year. We don't have any data on how many people attended last year or last to last year? What do these fewer indicate on numbers? We don't have the statistics of how many people so as to compare different years and calculate the discrepancy in attendance. Without this it's illogical to say that awareness is the problem. For example let's say in past year 1 lakh people came to watch the movie but next year only 90k turned up. Decrease of 10k people suggests that awareness might not be the single problem we are dealing with. There might be another problem that has been left untouched or ignored in the argument such as the content of the movie.
Secondly, Increase in positive reviews has been mentioned to suggest that awareness is the big problem but this assumption seems to be flawed because we don't know what kind of movies has been shown in the last year. For example, If the superhero genre has been produced and shown and if people who love comic books had come and watched the movie then their reviews will be biased. Reviews will be inundated with positive one beacuse It has targeted one specific segment of audience and that audience are naturally inclined towards these movies. So we don't know what kind of movies and for what kind of audience has been targeted in past years?
Altogether there is no specific information given so as to draw a definitive conclusion about whether budget allocation will solve the problem or not. Answers to these question will help the investors to do more research and to create a business plan which will cater to viwership problems.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-25 rubelmonir 16 view
2023-07-25 rubelmonir 60 view
2023-07-23 Mizanur_Rahman 50 view
2023-02-14 tedyang777 60 view
2022-11-13 barath002 58 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user anmolshukla96 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
..., It seems to be a logical solution but some of the information given is either insufficien...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ok and determine all the factor involved before reaching a conclusion Firstly, t...
^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...he past year than in any other year. We dont have any data on how many people attend...
^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... do these fewer indicate on numbers? We dont have the statistics of how many people ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... have the statistics of how many people so as to compare different years and calculate t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 154, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ssumption seems to be flawed because we dont know what kind of movies has been shown...
^^^^
Line 4, column 551, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ly inclined towards these movies. So we dont know what kind of movies and for what k...
^^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... there is no specific information given so as to draw a definitive conclusion about whet...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, as to, for example, kind of, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 355.0 441.139720559 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74366197183 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45488392158 2.78398813304 88% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 204.123752495 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501408450704 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3919992262 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 119.503703932 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 23.324526521 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9375 5.70786347227 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217598507143 0.218282227539 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685298155315 0.0743258471296 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656504352953 0.0701772020484 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0837705275292 0.128457276422 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935553493193 0.0628817314937 149% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.3550499002 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.5979740519 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 98.500998004 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 359 350
No. of Characters: 1658 1500
No. of Different Words: 179 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.353 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.618 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.439 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 112 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 87 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 31 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.438 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.5 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.562 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.329 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.395 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.135 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 2 5