Some people think that people should be given the right to use freshwater as they like. Others believe governments should strictly control the use of freshwater. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Opinions diverge on whether the government should give permission for people to use freshwater freely instead of controlling it strickly. Although this sentiment can be justified to some extent, I am in opposition to some rational reasons.
Admittedly, the use of freshwater controlled by the government can lead to a pandemic outbreak because of the water shortage. This can be explained by the fact that the control of freshwater strictly can limit the demand for human daily use, which in turn impacts the sanitary conditions of the population. Once a large number of people are stressed now that freshwater is not enough for their washing or brushing, it is time for the bacteria to threaten people’s health. By that, the government’s regulation on consuming freshwater can do a great disservice to residents’ life.
Conversely, I express my strong support for saving natural resources by the government's hand in controlling freshwater. When it comes to the overuse of freshwater, preserved water sources become scarcer. The reason is that industrial waste pollutes the water body and the salinization process transpires quickly, which leads to fewer amounts of drinkable water. Hence, if there is no governmental intervention, water is not enough to supply for humans in the future. Moreover, natural disaster is attributed to the extraction of groundwater caused by human overconsumption without the government’s management. Earthquakes, for example, can occur regularly when the earth's crust is lighter because of the lack of groundwater and sinking terrain worsens the situation.
By way of conclusion, notwithstanding the advantages of giving the freedom for citizens to use water, I ascertain that the government’s control can protect not only humans but also the planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-23 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-26 | TLan168 | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-19 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-22 | kevann | 67 | view |
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 11
- Some people think that people should be given the right to use freshwater as they like Others believe governments should strictly control the use of freshwater Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- International travel is becoming cheaper and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages 56
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 312, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tary conditions of the population. Once a large number of people are stressed now that freshwater...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...’s management. Earthquakes, for example, can occur regularly when the earths crus...
^^
Line 3, column 769, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sinking terrain worsens the situation. By way of conclusion, notwithstanding th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, hence, if, moreover, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46402877698 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22553577746 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593525179856 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9672539553 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.846153846 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53846153846 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241682244525 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088397572621 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982288294971 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17188038067 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112608352756 0.056905535591 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.