Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In today’s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Some people argue that working speedily and risk making errors are integral aspects in this contemporary world. They cite that to compete in this globalization world, one should take risk and work fast to achieve success. However, I strongly disagree with these people and believe that work gradually and cautiously brings huge success than working skyrocket and making huge mistakes by taking risks for following two reasons.
To begin with working sluggishly and carefully guaranteeing the higher quality. For instance, Tesla owner Elon Musk become the richest man in the planet today not because of his hasty decision, but just because of his slow and cautious plans. Indeed he devoted more than three decades to stand the company Tesla and SpaceX, which are the epitome of higher quality. If he did hasty decision in past, then he would not able to know Elon Musk. It is important to guaranteed the higher quality because if it helps to increase the faith among the consumer in case of business man and to be succeed in life. Thus, delay work and cautious ensures the higher quality work.
Furthermore, working quickly brings unfortunate and which is not acceptable, whereas slow and steady work is always brings fortune in life. It is one axioms that the "yield of slow work is always healthy", while "yield of hastiness always brings demons". For example, everyone is aware about the disasters of nuclear power which was happened in Chernobyl in formal Soviet Union Republic. One of scientist click the bottom in so hasty without remembering the consequences of that and rest is history. It is important to know the consequences of taking rapid decisions because it helps to make aware to take right decision carefully. Thus, working speedily without knowing consequence is not acceptable.
To sum up, whether the work quickly and take reckless decision by taking risk is crucial in this modern world is complex. Some suggested that to compete in his fast growing world one should take risky and should work quickly. Nevertheless, I still contend that working slowly and carefully brings fortune and guaranteeing the high productivity.
- In the United States employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day However many employees want to work a four day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so A mandatory policy requiring companies to offer their employee 80
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifolia a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida started to die out No one is sure exactly what caused the decline but chances are good that if nothing is done Torreya will soon become extinct Experts are co 93
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late 1960s not to suppress natural forest fires The let it burn policy assumed that forest fires would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summer of 1988 forest 80
- Professor Today we re going to talk about the debate between economic growth and protecting the environment Economic growth creates new jobs and gives people money they can use to improve their lives On the other hand if we protect the environment it can
- Every year forest fires and severe storms cause a great deal of damage to forests in the northwestern United States One way of dealing with the aftermath of these disasters is called salvage logging which is the practice of removing dead trees from affect 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...because of his slow and cautious plans. Indeed he devoted more than three decades to s...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...igher quality. If he did hasty decision in past, then he would not able to know Elon Mu...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 322, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arefully brings fortune and guaranteeing the high productivity.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, then, thus, whereas, while, for example, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16761363636 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67071897869 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517045454545 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5366150307 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.055555556 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23679866864 0.236089414692 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766474373311 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621166866598 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150828035759 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705558135061 0.0645574589148 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.