Some people say that the Internet provides people with a lot of valuable information. Others think access to too much information creates problems. Which view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one can deny the fact that the internet has changed our lives significantly, both positively and negatively. Some people argue the internet provides valuable information and they cite the omnipresence of internet and its easy access improves living standard of people. However, I disagree with this argument and strongly believes that too much information also creates problems. I will support my reasons in the following paragraphs.
First, having too much information and the easy access to the internet for everyone is very harmful to the society. Nowadays it is a very common practice that in slight or moderate medical problems, people trust the internet more. For example, in case of headache and fever, which is a symptom and could be caused by any irregularity in the body, people search for medication without consulting to doctor or pepper body checkup. These practices are most common in the developing countries, where people do not want to fall into hospital debt. This medication, though, sometime work just fine, but in unfortunate cases, may cause severe life-threatening scenario. It is important to understand that not every information given on the internet is true or work in every case and, in result, creates more problem.
Second, the internet contains not only medical science information but sometime personal information as well. Data uploaded to any website by any user or government information about the public is also stored on the internet. Anyone with a good understanding of the internet can easily access this information, which may include very crucial information such as medical history, address, family details, and living address. This is not only dangerous to the public but also to the people from the government. For instance, a few years back, in the United States, a person extracted information such as family details and living address of a congressperson and showed up at the house. This could have not the case if the details were not there on the internet. This makes it easy to understand that sometime too much information present on the internet can create problems. So in my opinion, access to too much information creates problem.
To conclude, it is a complex issue to decide whether access to too much information is valuable or problematic. However, I still contend that having access to too much information creates problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-15 | himanshu186 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | himanshu186 | 73 | view |
| 2020-10-04 | Amarathe3 | 83 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The extended family grandparents cousins aunts and uncles is less important now than it was in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reason and example to support your thesis 66
- Pros and cons of four days a week policy 83
- Declining sea otter population 71
- project and group 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, still, well, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18087855297 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88275061704 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511627906977 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.364827642 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.25 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350751252881 0.236089414692 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113096635254 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717599808735 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234823091235 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395422472433 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.