It is more effective to study in a group of students than to study alone.
Studying is a very important part of life. You can study in a group or alone and that depends on your technique of studying. However, some people think that studying individually is more beneficial than studying in a group, while others believe that studying in group is better for students. In my opinion, I strongly agree with studying in group due to following two reasons.
Creating new ideas is the first reason of why studying in group is more beneficial than studying alone. When you study with your classmates and work together on a specific subject you collect many new ideas and you can develop it easily. With a group, there are many different minds thinking in different ways and with different ideas from different points of view, about the same subject. Thus, when you gather all this ideas and come up with a perfect combination idea. The semester project is the best example for studying in group, with my group we got a full grades in our project and we finished it in a short time because we divided the whole work among us.
Learning how to cooperate with others is the second reason of studying in a group is better than studying alone. In our world, cooperating with others is very important skill that you need to get a job and even to succeed. If you are being a close person and you do not like to work with others, certainly you will fail. As a students, studying in group is the first step for me to learn this skill that I will need it a lot in my future. Studying in group will help me to get used to others people and cooperate with people that may I just know them for the first time. For example, when you finish your study and you get your job, you will never feel uncomfortable and shy around new people there because you already got used to work with people in school and college.
Thus, in conclusion, studying in group is very essential to everyone of us. We can develop ideas together and improve them, also we can meet new friends and be confident when we meet new people in school or in work. Studying in group is easier and beneficial for the whole group members to accomplish their goals.
- People s behaviour is largely determined by the forces of not their own making 66
- The Sydney Opera House 73
- Professors on Television 83
- Memoir 80
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...elop it easily. With a group, there are many different minds thinking in different ways and wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...same subject. Thus, when you gather all this ideas and come up with a perfect combin...
^^^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...ith others, certainly you will fail. As a students, studying in group is the first step fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 390.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48461538462 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34830502473 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.433333333333 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1362263631 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1666666667 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336698345975 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155243745972 0.076458572812 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136389770802 0.0737576698707 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264651101493 0.150856017488 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142317817825 0.0645574589148 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.01818996416 83% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 86.8835125448 55% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.